This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
While its potential to revolutionize patientcare is undeniable (and increasingly being proven ), healthcare leaders remain acutely aware of the risks involved with implementation. 2,3,4 Each framework offers unique guidance tailored to specific aspects of AI riskmanagement. Clinical AI represents a paradox.
healthcare systems, experienced a ransomware attack that took its IT network offline, disrupting patientcare in 15 states. This presents a classic risk-reward challenge: while data is the foundation for AI’s capabilities, it simultaneously introduces considerable cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
We have a perfect storm of rapid adoption and implementation alongside government mandates for data codification and interoperability. The Maturation and Regulation of AI As outlined above, the rapid adoption and implementation of healthcare AI necessitates governance. What is the impact that we anticipate now and moving forward?
While AI offers tremendous potential to improve data management and streamline patientcare, the technology also introduces a variety of risks that must be carefully addressed at every stage of the adoption process from strategy and integration to change management and governance. Have additional questions?
While not specific to the unique needs of healthcare, AIME emphasizes key areas such as data governance, model validation and monitoring that are essential practices in effective clinical AI governance. and GDPR in the EU.
Riskmanagement frameworks become invaluable here, serving as the operational foundation that healthcare providers and administrators can rely on to safeguard patient data. Guidance frameworks like the NIST AI RiskManagement Framework (AI RMF) and ISO/IEC 23894 provide actionable guidance to identify and mitigate risks.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000 users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content